Screen shot of Tannehill's splits this season:

4 TD's, 1 INT in wins.
4 TD's, 11 INT's in losses.

If he plays poorly, we lose.
If he plays mediocre, we win.

Give him some experience, some weapons and some better protection and maybe we can watch the number of poor performances go down.

One pick per sack, have not looked but I am going to guess that those losses were against teams that have decent d-lines.
Between the lack of protection, and the diminished run game I think a good portion of our bad play starts right at the o-line. That matched with limited targets for Tanne to throw to makes things tough.

He has not been perfect for sure, needs to work on many things. But it sure would be nice if the staff gives him some more help...

The sad part about this is we need a lot of help in almost every are on offense. Our offensive line is obviously struggling to run the zone blocking scheme and can't consistenly open lanes for our runningbacks.. We need big help there. Our receiver corps is is thin and unproductive. We need a lot of help there.

It starts with finding linemen capable of running our system and giving us a consistent run game as well as giving Tannehill more time to scan the field. It ends with us bringing in more playmakers outside the hashes.

If we do those things, then Tannehill and the offense will take off. We have the picks and $$$ to get it done. It's just a matter of Ireland sitting down with the staff and getting it done this next offseason.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... f-waivers/

I'm trying to figure out how a passing offense can't throw for 200 yards. There is definitely a lot of work that needs to be done in the offseason.

Too many 3 and outs, not connecting downfield, Bess running backward after catches, drops, Tannehill throwing behind guys on slants...

Ya, especially with the rules in place today. You're practically spotted 200.

It's always been about TD/INT. Check playoff bound teams QB TD/INT ratios.