All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ




Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Yes Please!
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:57 am 
Offline
Phinfever Draft Anaylst
Phinfever Draft Anaylst

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:52 am
Posts: 12641
Location: Lancaster, PA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpMWjmfwhCg



just say yes to RG3


Top
   
 Post subject: RG111
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:52 am 
Offline
Phinfever Starter
Phinfever Starter

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:46 pm
Posts: 226
I watched the Baylor vs Washington game last night to see what all the fuss was about RG111. After watching the game, I don't have a clue as to how good RG111 really is.
Both defenses were horrible, it was like watching a high school game.

One thing is certain, if RG111 comes out, Miami will have to trade up to draft him. Quite frankly,
his lack of size and the quality of his opponents, would give me concern. Lots of college QB's
( yes, I'll include Tebow on that list, although the verdict is still out on him ) have been unable to
transcend their game to the NFL level.

Miami needs a franchise QB, but they won't find one in the draft this year. So, let's take our
frustration out on the Jets. Destroy them, and send Jason Taylor riding off into the sunset with
a big smile on his face.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: RG111
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:17 am 
Offline
Phinfever Lead Moderator
Phinfever Lead Moderator

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:04 pm
Posts: 9003
OVERRATED!!!


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: RG111
PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 9:03 am 
Offline
Phinfever Draft Guru
Phinfever Draft Guru

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 10562
Location: MA
I wouldn't base your opinion on just last night's game. The guy has a lot of talent.

With the amount of teams needing QBs and this guy's banner year I would imagine Miami will have to pay a hefty price to get him. But who knows, maybe when scouts break down the tape they find flaws and he drops. Far too early to tell.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: RG111