Phins Rock wrote:
Why trade up for a player who would be playing the same position that we currently have the most depth on the roster on?
Suh is a beast, but not worth trading up 10 spots for in such a great draft.....MAYBE if he played a position of need, or something we did not have much youth in. But that's not the case.
If you call depth a bunch of under achieving non-dominate players, ferg is like 39 and I have not been impressed with any of our younger guys
I agree its not the satus quo to do it, but for what people are calling the BEST prospect in 32 years, thats a big deal. the contract shouldnt matter because there is no salary cap
I wasn't referring to NT...I was reffering to DE. Sorry for the mis communication.
Suh would not be a NT in a 34. I could
see him being a Jay Ratliff type of a guy, but I see him more as a Randy Starks if he plays in a 34.