Phinfever.com

Catch the madness!

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ




Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:34 am 
Offline
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:15 pm
Posts: 292
Location: Shelbyville, IN
It is well known that St. Louis Needs a QB, and the number one pick is not a good place for a qb considering the depth of them in this draft. Would you be willing to trade up to get the dominant DT Ndamukong Suh. I know this would put us in a bind for getting as much talent as we wanted to out of the draft but even Mel Kiper said that he might be the most dominant DT he has seen in 32 years of covering drafts. Probably won't happen but wonder what your guys thoughts were on it.

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:15 am 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:24 am
Posts: 4104
If we could trade away some current players for additional picks, then heck yea!!

If we aren't able to do that, then I'm afraid it would put a damper on the adding talent to the team.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar
2016 DRAFT GURU
2016 DRAFT GURU

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 5489
Location: Columbia, SC
Not going to happen. You are talking about multiple picks to get up and get Ndamankung, and with this draft being as deep as it is, Miami can rebuild there LB corp and add talent and depth to other positions.

I can see Miami trading down for sure though to try to acquire additional picks.

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:35 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Tampa, FL
With all the talent at positions of need for the fins, I really don't see them trading up. In the end anything is possible, but trading up in round 1 is highly unlikely.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:43 pm 
Offline
Phinfever Rookie
Phinfever Rookie

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:13 pm
Posts: 30
Are you kidding the rams sit pretty right were there at and there needs.

1 . best DT in draft # 1
2. IF they wanted to the #2 pick can be Tebow( If jacksonville dont get him ) or Mcoy not to bad if you ask me so i dont see them tradeing unless the offers is too good to pass up.
3. I dont think the the dolphins want to spend the $ on another 1st rd draft pick.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:19 pm 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7530
Location: Massachusetts
Why trade up for a player who would be playing the same position that we currently have the most depth on the roster on?

Suh is a beast, but not worth trading up 10 spots for in such a great draft.....MAYBE if he played a position of need, or something we did not have much youth in. But that's not the case.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:18 pm 
Offline
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:15 pm
Posts: 292
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Phins Rock wrote:
Why trade up for a player who would be playing the same position that we currently have the most depth on the roster on?

Suh is a beast, but not worth trading up 10 spots for in such a great draft.....MAYBE if he played a position of need, or something we did not have much youth in. But that's not the case.



If you call depth a bunch of under achieving non-dominate players, ferg is like 39 and I have not been impressed with any of our younger guys

I agree its not the satus quo to do it, but for what people are calling the BEST prospect in 32 years, thats a big deal. the contract shouldnt matter because there is no salary cap

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:52 pm 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7530
Location: Massachusetts
Iceberg85 wrote:
Phins Rock wrote:
Why trade up for a player who would be playing the same position that we currently have the most depth on the roster on?

Suh is a beast, but not worth trading up 10 spots for in such a great draft.....MAYBE if he played a position of need, or something we did not have much youth in. But that's not the case.



If you call depth a bunch of under achieving non-dominate players, ferg is like 39 and I have not been impressed with any of our younger guys

I agree its not the satus quo to do it, but for what people are calling the BEST prospect in 32 years, thats a big deal. the contract shouldnt matter because there is no salary cap


I wasn't referring to NT...I was reffering to DE. Sorry for the mis communication.

Suh would not be a NT in a 34. I could see him being a Jay Ratliff type of a guy, but I see him more as a Randy Starks if he plays in a 34.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited | Chopped and modified by Coots | Original design by Prosk8r