| View unanswered posts | View active topics |
It is currently Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:08 am |
|
Phinfever Chat Room Note: You must be logged into the boards to access chat! All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
|
Page 2 of 2 |
[ 54 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2 |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Phinfever All Pro  Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:41 pm Posts: 334 
|
 Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4Yay way to solve a issue internally great job i think this will be a good move with odrick & Langford on the ends...Can Merling Play OLB? at all?
|
| Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:08 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Draft Insider   Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm Posts: 3376 Location: Columbia, SC
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 No, but Phillip can provide depth at the DE/DT position.
_________________ 
|
| Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:22 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Live! Radio Host   Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:15 am Posts: 6907 Location: ELP, TX.
|
Re: Starks to NT Iowafin wrote: The Hen wrote: Iowa, this is Ireland talking......LOL Sparano and Nolan will have the final say, I would think. He did say , "not to give away any stratagy". LOL The "versatility" they have added has me thinking alot of things. Anyway's, the Ireland PC is on MD.com Yeah, I know, you just said you figured they'd get a NT elsewhere and not put Starks there. That, to me, almost makes Odrick as a wasted pick...I just don't think you draft depth guys in the first round. I never said they won't put him there....what I thought I said was that they would bring in someone else into the mix....should have added "to compete." _________________  Phinfever Live!!! Listen Live: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/phinfeverradio RIP, Tom |
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:03 am |
|
|
|
|
2014 Phinfever VIP!  Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:41 pm Posts: 465
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 phinsfansc wrote: No, but Phillip can provide depth at the DE/DT position. Agreed. Merling has the size to move into a 3 technique on obvious passing downs. Him and Odrick inside with Wake and either Misi or Anderson on the outside should be able to put adequate pressure on the quarterback. |
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:19 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend   Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:48 pm Posts: 5154
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 Worst idea in the history of ideas.
Starks is not an NT. I don't care if we're talking hyrbrid or pure 3-4. We've all seen what happens when he mans the position. _________________ 
|
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:29 am |
|
|
|
|
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor  Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:10 pm Posts: 5426 Location: Topsfield, MA
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 If this is true it makes for 5 guys who can rotate in and out of the nose - Ferguson, Soliai, Starks, Odrick and McDaniel. Certainly could keep players fresh.
If Starks can do it it solves an enormous need. |
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:54 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Hall of Famer  Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:37 pm Posts: 892 Location: Orlando, Fl
|
Re: Starks to NT I think part of the reason that Odrick was drafted is because he can play inside or outside. Bill Parcells likes competition and Odrick puts pressure on Langford, Merling, Starks, McDaniel, and Solai to produce.
I like the idea of Starks playing nose sometimes and playing end other times. He is emerging as a force that can really disrupt offenses. |
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:43 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:48 pm Posts: 5154
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 jammer wrote: If this is true it makes for 5 guys who can rotate in and out of the nose - Ferguson, Soliai, Starks, Odrick and McDaniel. Certainly could keep players fresh. If Starks can do it it solves an enormous need. We already know he can't. We've already seen when he had to man that position. _________________
|
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:47 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend  Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:35 pm Posts: 3330 Location: Charleston AFB, SC
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 This is retarded. Starks has failed there before. Why would they do that? Idiots... should have taken Cody when they had the chance.
_________________ 
|
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:28 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Live!, Blog Writer   Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am Posts: 20600 Location: Miami, FL
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 Rock Sexton wrote: Worst idea in the history of ideas. Starks is not an NT. I don't care if we're talking hyrbrid or pure 3-4. We've all seen what happens when he mans the position. We've all seen what happens when he mans the position when he hasn't played or practiced it. _________________ 
|
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:28 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Global Moderator  Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am Posts: 7532 Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 Guys. Odrick cannot and will not play NG.
Jeff Ireland has already said that what he meant by the "inside or outside" think was outside in base 34 situations, and he can move back inside on 4 D-line sets (dime, nickel, etc.). He's not going to play NT though. |
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:02 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever All Pro Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:12 am Posts: 347
|
Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 Has Starks had experience as a NT before?
_________________ 
|
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:02 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend  Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm Posts: 5439
|
Re: Starks to NT The Hen wrote: Iowafin wrote: The Hen wrote: Iowa, this is Ireland talking......LOL Sparano and Nolan will have the final say, I would think. He did say , "not to give away any stratagy". LOL The "versatility" they have added has me thinking alot of things. Anyway's, the Ireland PC is on MD.com Yeah, I know, you just said you figured they'd get a NT elsewhere and not put Starks there. That, to me, almost makes Odrick as a wasted pick...I just don't think you draft depth guys in the first round. I never said they won't put him there....what I thought I said was that they would bring in someone else into the mix....should have added "to compete." Gotchya  _________________ 
|
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:05 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:49 am Posts: 4144 Location: The Bluegrass
|
Re: Starks to NT IamPZ wrote: I'm just saying... I don't think these guys are so much looking for guys who can go out there and play a certain number of snaps... I think they're looking for guys who perform at a high level when they are out there... get a bunch of guys together who can perform at a high level then you have the luxury of continuously swapping players in and out without much difference in the talent level. Sparano is obsessive about player snap counts and trying to limit them based on position. There are some guys who will play every snap, but there are guys, even guys we might consider money, who are purposefully limited in field time so as not to wear them down too much. _________________ A good RB is nice, a good QB even better, but it's best to be able to stop someone first. |
| Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:42 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 2 |
[ 54 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2 |
|
Phinfever Chat Room Note: You must be logged into the boards to access chat! All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum |