All times are UTC-05:00

Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ

Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

Change OT Rules?
Yes 75%  75%  [ 3 ]
No 25%  25%  [ 1 ]
For Playoffs Only 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes: 4
Author Message
 Post subject: OT Rules Change?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:09 pm 
User avatar
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439

NEW YORK (AP)—NFL owners will vote next week whether to allow each team a possession in overtime in the playoffs if the team winning the OT coin toss kicks a field goal on the first series.

Previously, the game would end whenever either side scores, as happened in the NFC championship game in January, with New Orleans beating Minnesota on Garrett Hartley’s(notes) kick. But NFL competition committee chairman Rich McKay says a trend has developed showing too strong an advantage for teams winning the coin toss to start overtime.

If the team that falls behind by three points on the first series also kicks a field goal, then the game would continue under current sudden death rules.

The proposal is only for the postseason.

“Statistically, it is pretty clear there has been a change,” McKay said. “When sudden death was put in for 1974, it clearly worked very well and was a good system. It brought excitement and effectively broke ties. From ’74-’93 you had a 50-50 (breakdown) in who would win between those who won toss and who lost the toss.

“Changes occurred over time, and the numbers have changed to 59.8 percent winning the coin toss and winning the game. The team that loses the coin toss wins 38.5 percent.

“We are trying to put in a system that emphasizes more skill and strategy as opposed to the randomness of the coin flip.”

McKay credited the advancements in field goal accuracy and skills of return teams for the hefty switch in statistics. The competition committee found that since 1994, when the kickoff was moved back 5 yards to the 30, teams winning the OT coin toss won 34.4 percent of the games on the first series. They kicked field goals 26.2 percent of those times, an increase from 17.9 percent in 15 years.

“I would say this is something that’s been on our radar for a number of years and been talked about a lot,” he said. “In the last four or five years, we have not proposed anything because we thought if there weren’t enough votes (among the 32 owners), we should not propose it. This year, the statistics are so compelling we need to get the discussion going.”

Rest assured there will be plenty of discussion; 24 votes are needed to adopt the change.

“Overtime, since 1958, has had … the first team that scores, wins,” said Redskins general manager Bruce Allen. I like the 1958 rules better” than the proposal.

The players union strongly has supported the current overtime setup because it fears another system could lead to more injuries. McKay said the competition committee has “not spent a lot of time with them” on this proposal, but will make the players association aware of the recommendation.

Questions have been raised whether altering overtime is something that must be collectively bargained with the union, but the league says it would simply be a rule change the NFL can enact unilaterally.

Another recommendation to the owners, who will hold their meetings in Orlando, Fla., beginning Sunday, centers on expanding protection for defenseless players, most notably receivers. McKay said a recent rule change helped, but there are cases where receivers already have made a catch and still are defenseless when they get hit in the head area.

The proposal will offer those players protection from hits to the head until after the catch is made and the receiver has an opportunity to protect himself.

AP Sports Writer Howard Fendrich in Washington contributed to this story.

I say forget the OT change and get rid of all the ticky tack "illegal contact" penalties. This isn't basketball, it's football. I don't think you should be allowed to completely tackle a receiver running a route, but it's getting ridiculous out there.


 Post subject: Re: OT Rules Change?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:28 pm 
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7530
Location: Massachusetts
I agree with your last statement iowa.

I don't agree that the playoff rules should be the same though. I think a change needs to be made, but not just for the playoffs...that's stupid.

For me, a system where it's the first team to score 4 or more points, would be good. That way, the defense has a much better shot at stopping the opponent as they would have to score a TD; it would make OT for exciting because teams would not be playing conservative just to try and get the FG; and it would not acquire the NFL to copy college football, something that it will try and always stay away from.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC-05:00

Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited | Chopped and modified by Coots | Original design by Prosk8r