NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson
| Author |
Message |
|
Rich
Phinfever Radio Host/Blog Writer
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am
Posts: 19879
Location: Miami, FL
|
 Re: NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson 10acjed wrote: Makchell wrote: In fact, some people have proposed cutting all of the offensive linemen on the team since we don't need them anymore.
Dang, who said that? I don't remember reading that post. A bit of an exaggeration Or a joke at the expense of someone who exaggerates what others are saying?
_________________
|
| Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:41 am |
|
|
|
Dphins4me
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:23 pm
Posts: 3772
|
Re: NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson Quote: Selecting a fifth offensive lineman in the draft's first two-rounds since 2007 certainly isn't sexy This tells me Miami is failing somewhere. Whether it be at scouting or in the development of these players.
|
| Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:30 am |
|
|
|
Rich
Phinfever Radio Host/Blog Writer
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am
Posts: 19879
Location: Miami, FL
|
Re: NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson Dphins4me wrote: Quote: Selecting a fifth offensive lineman in the draft's first two-rounds since 2007 certainly isn't sexy This tells me Miami is failing somewhere. Whether it be at scouting or in the development of these players. Disagree. Most of those selections have been good players. Jake Long, Mike Pouncey, Samson Satele... none of them are busts. Still waiting on Jonathan Martin. Jake Long simply broke down physically... Pouncey is an arrow up player. Satele is still in the league with the Colts. He was simply a victim of circumstance. He got drafted by one regime in 2007 that believed in zone blocking, but he was not a system fit in 2008 when they went to a power blocking scheme. He's not a worldbeater, but is a starting caliber player.
_________________
|
| Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:37 am |
|
|
|
Dphins4me
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:23 pm
Posts: 3772
|
Re: NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson Rich wrote: Disagree.
Most of those selections have been good players.
Jake Long, Mike Pouncey, Samson Satele... none of them are busts. Still waiting on Jonathan Martin.
Jake Long simply broke down physically... Pouncey is an arrow up player.
Satele is still in the league with the Colts. He was simply a victim of circumstance. He got drafted by one regime in 2007 that believed in zone blocking, but he was not a system fit in 2008 when they went to a power blocking scheme. He's not a worldbeater, but is a starting caliber player. Now we are back to changing OLman again. Constance change brings no change. Has Satele been a good starting player is the question?
|
| Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:49 am |
|
|
|
Makchell
Phinfever Global Moderator
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:04 pm
Posts: 5296
|
Re: NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson Disagree.
Most of those selections have been good players.
Jake Long, Mike Pouncey, Samson Satele... none of them are busts. Still waiting on Jonathan Martin.
Jake Long simply broke down physically... Pouncey is an arrow up player.
Satele is still in the league with the Colts. He was simply a victim of circumstance. He got drafted by one regime in 2007 that believed in zone blocking, but he was not a system fit in 2008 when they went to a power blocking scheme. He's not a worldbeater, but is a starting caliber player.
Yes they are "solid" players, but we haven't won a SB drafting that way. it's time to draft playmakers, not safe OL picks.
|
| Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:41 am |
|
|
|
Rich
Phinfever Radio Host/Blog Writer
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am
Posts: 19879
Location: Miami, FL
|
Re: NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson Dphins4me wrote: Now we are back to changing OLman again. Constance change brings no change. Exactly, every regime wants their players and every 2-3 years we have a new regime.
_________________
|
| Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:18 am |
|
|
|
Rich
Phinfever Radio Host/Blog Writer
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am
Posts: 19879
Location: Miami, FL
|
Re: NOW we should trade up for Lane Johnson Makchell wrote: Yes they are "solid" players, but we haven't won a SB drafting that way. it's time to draft playmakers, not safe OL picks. That wasn't the point I was making, though. I am in agreement with taking a playmaker.
_________________
|
| Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:18 am |
|
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], rhoads30 and 6 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|
