| View unanswered posts | View active topics |
It is currently Tue Mar 03, 2015 12:00 am |
|
Phinfever Chat Room Note: You must be logged into the boards to access chat! All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 15 posts ] |
| Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
ESPN pre-draft power rankings
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor   Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:22 am Posts: 1480 Location: Chesapeake, VA 
|
 ESPN pre-draft power rankings_________________ Don't give up. Don't ever give up." - Jim Valvano |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:05 pm |
 
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend  Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:05 pm Posts: 2450 Location: NSW, Australia
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings We should have finished the season somewhere around there, being 7-9.
It is difficult to say we did not improve, yet we stay at #19. We shall see where this goes throughout the rest of the offseason. |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:22 pm |
|
|
|
|
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:11 pm Posts: 8963 Location: Fargo, ND
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings degs wrote: We should have finished the season somewhere around there, being 7-9. It is difficult to say we did not improve, yet we stay at #19. We shall see where this goes throughout the rest of the offseason. We've improved at the wide receiver position, and some might say the TE position. That being said, the Linebacker swap might be tit for tat, and we lost our probowl starting left tackle, starting RB, and a starting CB. For a pre-draft ranking, I think it's fair. |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:29 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:05 pm Posts: 2450 Location: NSW, Australia
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings Phin wrote: degs wrote: We should have finished the season somewhere around there, being 7-9. It is difficult to say we did not improve, yet we stay at #19. We shall see where this goes throughout the rest of the offseason. We've improved at the wide receiver position, and some might say the TE position. That being said, the Linebacker swap might be tit for tat, and we lost our probowl starting left tackle, starting RB, and a starting CB. For a pre-draft ranking, I think it's fair. I had already forgot about the CB.....Tom Jones, wasn't it???? OK, I'll agree. It's fair. |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 3:36 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Live!, Blog Writer   Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am Posts: 22172 Location: Miami, FL
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings Phin wrote: We've improved at the wide receiver position, and some might say the TE position. That being said, the Linebacker swap might be tit for tat, and we lost our probowl starting left tackle, starting RB, and a starting CB. For a pre-draft ranking, I think it's fair. Our starting left tackle USED to be a Pro Bowl left tackle, but he wasn't one in 2012. We lost the 46th ranked offensive tackle according to PFF. We also lost a pretty mediocre starting CB. The only player we lost that was actually a plus to this team was the RB. _________________ 
|
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:12 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 2:05 pm Posts: 2450 Location: NSW, Australia
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings Rich wrote: Phin wrote: We've improved at the wide receiver position, and some might say the TE position. That being said, the Linebacker swap might be tit for tat, and we lost our probowl starting left tackle, starting RB, and a starting CB. For a pre-draft ranking, I think it's fair. Our starting left tackle USED to be a Pro Bowl left tackle, but he wasn't one in 2012. We lost the 46th ranked offensive tackle according to PFF. We also lost a pretty mediocre starting CB. The only player we lost that was actually a plus to this team was the RB. We do have someone waiting in the wings to replace the RB, but we have no replacement for the LT, nor the CB. So at the moment we have taken a fairly large step backward in those positions. There is still an argument for a small shift up, but I do agree with somewhat static ranking. |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:22 pm |
|
|
|
|
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:22 am Posts: 1480 Location: Chesapeake, VA
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings Every team loses players and adds players every year.
The players that have left the Dolphins were calculated departures. Some were not good fits, having joined the Dolphins under a different coaching staff. The players that joined the Dolphins were not just haphazard additions of someone randomly throwing money around. They are great choices who compliment our system, and in my opinion, the Dolphins have improved much already, and that is before the draft. _________________ Don't give up. Don't ever give up." - Jim Valvano |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:39 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Owner/Admin   Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am Posts: 9641 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings rodneyfaile wrote: http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=nflnation&id=74371 Miami Dolphins ranked #19. This is ok with me. I'd be nervous if they bumped us up due to free agent additions. The team is a little more exciting. _________________ PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US! 
|
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:49 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Global Moderator   Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:53 pm Posts: 4194 Location: Palm Beach County, Florida
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings I will just cut to the chase. We are a super bowl contender.
_________________ 2015. Jets & Bills new regimes & no QB. Pats , nowhere to go but down. We come back with best young QB in the game plus we keep the best regime intact. Making of dynasty. |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:52 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Owner/Admin Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am Posts: 9641 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings Quote: Q: Is Miami any better now than they were last month? ESPN: Absolutely, Teddy. The Dolphins were not nearly as explosive or athletic as they are now. They got faster at WR, TE and LB. Most importantly, I think Ryan Tannehill will be better in Year 2. His growth will make the Dolphins better overall. http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/chat/_/ ... mes-walker _________________ PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US!
|
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:00 pm |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Legend Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:59 pm Posts: 5117
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings This list says that Danny Amendola is an upgrade over Wes Welker. Just reading that you can tell that this list is 100% pure BS.
|
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:49 pm |
|
|
|
|
2014 Phinfever VIP!  Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:35 am Posts: 1450 Location: Lakeland, Fl
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings Last time I checked Miami's 2012 record was still 7-9.
_________________ 
|
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:15 pm |
|
|
|
|
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:22 am Posts: 1480 Location: Chesapeake, VA
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings I think they are going in the right direction. If they continue and have a decent draft, which I fully expect, I see at least 10 wins. Maybe a playoff game.
The jets are #31 and the bills are #28. That's about right, but I think #5 is kinda high for the pats, and I don't see the Seahawks #1. The 49ers look tops to me right now. _________________ Don't give up. Don't ever give up." - Jim Valvano |
| Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:39 pm |
|
|
|
|
2014 Phinfever VIP! Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:52 am Posts: 7261 Location: Lancaster, PA
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings the Rams, Steelers and Cowboys will not be better than Miami
|
| Wed Mar 20, 2013 2:25 am |
|
|
|
|
Phinfever Rookie  Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:58 pm Posts: 25 Location: Arizona
|
Re: ESPN pre-draft power rankings swerve13 wrote: the Rams, Steelers and Cowboys will not be better than Miami Agreed. |
| Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:59 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[ 15 posts ] |
|
Phinfever Chat Room Note: You must be logged into the boards to access chat! All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 8 guests |
| You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum |