View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 6:43 pm



Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4 
Author Message
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:41 pm
Posts: 334
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
Yay way to solve a issue internally great job i think this will be a good move with odrick & Langford on the ends...Can Merling Play OLB? at all?


Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:08 pm
Profile
Phinfever Draft Insider
Phinfever Draft Insider
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Columbia, SC
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
No, but Phillip can provide depth at the DE/DT position.

_________________
Image


Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:22 pm
Profile
Phinfever Live! Radio Host
Phinfever Live! Radio Host
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:15 am
Posts: 6930
Location: ELP, TX.
Post Re: Starks to NT
Iowafin wrote:
The Hen wrote:
Iowa, this is Ireland talking......LOL

Sparano and Nolan will have the final say, I would think. He did say , "not to give away any stratagy". LOL

The "versatility" they have added has me thinking alot of things.

Anyway's, the Ireland PC is on MD.com


Yeah, I know, you just said you figured they'd get a NT elsewhere and not put Starks there. That, to me, almost makes Odrick as a wasted pick...I just don't think you draft depth guys in the first round.



I never said they won't put him there....what I thought I said was that they would bring in someone else into the mix....should have added "to compete."

_________________
Image

Phinfever Live!!!

Listen Live: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/phinfeverradio

RIP, Tom


Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:03 am
Profile YIM
2014 Phinfever VIP!
2014 Phinfever VIP!

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:41 pm
Posts: 468
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
phinsfansc wrote:
No, but Phillip can provide depth at the DE/DT position.


Agreed. Merling has the size to move into a 3 technique on obvious passing downs. Him and Odrick inside with Wake and either Misi or Anderson on the outside should be able to put adequate pressure on the quarterback.


Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:19 am
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:48 pm
Posts: 5638
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
Worst idea in the history of ideas.

Starks is not an NT. I don't care if we're talking hyrbrid or pure 3-4. We've all seen what happens when he mans the position.

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:29 am
Profile
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:10 pm
Posts: 5838
Location: Topsfield, MA
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
If this is true it makes for 5 guys who can rotate in and out of the nose - Ferguson, Soliai, Starks, Odrick and McDaniel. Certainly could keep players fresh.

If Starks can do it it solves an enormous need.


Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:54 am
Profile
Phinfever Hall of Famer
Phinfever Hall of Famer

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:37 pm
Posts: 894
Location: Orlando, Fl
Post Re: Starks to NT
I think part of the reason that Odrick was drafted is because he can play inside or outside. Bill Parcells likes competition and Odrick puts pressure on Langford, Merling, Starks, McDaniel, and Solai to produce.

I like the idea of Starks playing nose sometimes and playing end other times. He is emerging as a force that can really disrupt offenses.


Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:43 am
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:48 pm
Posts: 5638
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
jammer wrote:
If this is true it makes for 5 guys who can rotate in and out of the nose - Ferguson, Soliai, Starks, Odrick and McDaniel. Certainly could keep players fresh.

If Starks can do it it solves an enormous need.


We already know he can't. We've already seen when he had to man that position.

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 24, 2010 4:47 am
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:35 pm
Posts: 3412
Location: Charleston AFB, SC
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
This is retarded. Starks has failed there before. Why would they do that? Idiots... should have taken Cody when they had the chance.

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:28 am
Profile
Phinfever Live!, Blog Writer
Phinfever Live!, Blog Writer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am
Posts: 21592
Location: Miami, FL
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
Rock Sexton wrote:
Worst idea in the history of ideas.

Starks is not an NT. I don't care if we're talking hyrbrid or pure 3-4. We've all seen what happens when he mans the position.


We've all seen what happens when he mans the position when he hasn't played or practiced it.

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:28 am
Profile
Phinfever Global Moderator
Phinfever Global Moderator

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7532
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
Guys. Odrick cannot and will not play NG.

Jeff Ireland has already said that what he meant by the "inside or outside" think was outside in base 34 situations, and he can move back inside on 4 D-line sets (dime, nickel, etc.). He's not going to play NT though.


Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:02 am
Profile
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:12 am
Posts: 347
Post Re: Very interesting read on Randy Starks move and tweaks to 3-4
Has Starks had experience as a NT before?

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:02 am
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Post Re: Starks to NT
The Hen wrote:
Iowafin wrote:
The Hen wrote:
Iowa, this is Ireland talking......LOL

Sparano and Nolan will have the final say, I would think. He did say , "not to give away any stratagy". LOL

The "versatility" they have added has me thinking alot of things.

Anyway's, the Ireland PC is on MD.com


Yeah, I know, you just said you figured they'd get a NT elsewhere and not put Starks there. That, to me, almost makes Odrick as a wasted pick...I just don't think you draft depth guys in the first round.



I never said they won't put him there....what I thought I said was that they would bring in someone else into the mix....should have added "to compete."


Gotchya :yay:

_________________
Image


Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:05 am
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:49 am
Posts: 4144
Location: The Bluegrass
Post Re: Starks to NT
IamPZ wrote:
I'm just saying... I don't think these guys are so much looking for guys who can go out there and play a certain number of snaps... I think they're looking for guys who perform at a high level when they are out there... get a bunch of guys together who can perform at a high level then you have the luxury of continuously swapping players in and out without much difference in the talent level.


Sparano is obsessive about player snap counts and trying to limit them based on position. There are some guys who will play every snap, but there are guys, even guys we might consider money, who are purposefully limited in field time so as not to wear them down too much.

_________________
A good RB is nice, a good QB even better, but it's best to be able to stop someone first.


Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:42 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Coots, Google [Bot], Google Feedfetcher and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2010 phpBB Group.
Designed by Coots & IamPZ - Phinfever.com.